Public Scoping Update for the
Tappan Zee Bridge/I-287
Environmental Review

In accordance with state and federal environmental regulations, the Tappan Zee Bridge/I-287 Environmental Review will be conducted as a two-tiered process. An initial Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will evaluate plans for improving the I-287 corridor (including the Tappan Zee Bridge) and assess transit options for the corridor, identifying a transit mode for the corridor, its general route and its termini. A second EIS will focus on the details of integrating that transit mode into the communities it will serve, including route specifics and transit station locations and designs. A final decision on the first EIS document will initiate work on the second.

Continuing the study in this way is expected to save several years and at least $500 million each year in project costs. Highway and bridge construction (including elements needed to support transit) will be under way while detailed transit plans are being developed through the second EIS. The transit system construction will follow once its details are reviewed and approved.

Changes in Federal Law Mean More Public Input, Streamlined Environmental Review and Less Potential for Project Delay

The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), which was enacted in August 2005, modified the federal legislation that governs studies such as the Tappan Zee Bridge/I-287 Environmental Review. Section 6002 of this act is intended to streamline the environmental review process and expedite project delivery, encourage early and frequent public involvement, and limit the potential for project delays. Key features of Section 6002 include:

• Increased opportunity for comment and involvement from agencies and the public. The public and agencies may comment on the following items (in addition to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and the Final Environmental Impact Statement):
  • Public and Agency Coordination Plan
  • Purpose and Need
  • Range of Alternatives
  • Methodologies
• Identification and engagement of Participating and Cooperating Government Agencies that have an interest in or jurisdiction over this study.
• A formal process for agencies to resolve issues.
• Establishment of a 180-day period for legal challenges to the Record of Decision (ROD) and other federal actions (such as federal permit decisions).